![]() ![]() Meanwhile, I've found "Techblocker" to be better than any of the above ad blockers as it actually bypasses the ad blocker detecters on over a dozen major sites (including Yahoo Mail), but I think it's only available for Chrome at the present time (itself an inside source of info for Google itself). Now, to read a 2 kilobytes of TEXT, I have to load 5 megabytes or more of cumbersome web pages graphics and ads when all I care about is the 2 kilobytes of text that actually compromises a typical news article, for example. I remember loading them on 56kbps modem in the 1990s. Only after it came into general use were sites magically able to detect you are using an ad blocker. What good is an ad blocker that only gets you locked out of perhaps 70% of all Internet sites you want to visit? I believe HTML5 is directly responsible. ![]() More and more sites are incorporating code that disables the site entirely or many of the features if an adblocker is in use. Kep55 said:I'm waiting for an ad blocker that will spoof the websites into thinking there is no ad blocker in place. Do you feel comfortable keeping ad revenue out of the hands of sites you enjoy and use for free? As good as the best ad blockers are, that's still a trade-off you need to consider when deciding whether to install one as a browser extension or as a standalone app. ![]() Find out which one best suits your needs and comfort level.Īs we noted at the outset, there's also an ethical component to ad blockers. Others, like AdBlocker Ultimate, take a more aggressive approach. Some ad blockers, such as AdBlock Plus include filters and the ability to let in non-obtrusive advertising. Do you just want to stop annoying pop-up ads from appearing or do you want the full range of services, including privacy features and an end to ad-tracking? Grab the ad blocker that ticks off all the boxes on your wishlist. You can narrow down your choice in ad blockers by deciding specifically what you're looking to accomplish with such an app or extension. You should also figure out if a browser extension will take care of your ad-blocking needs or whether you should consider switching browsers to one with more built-in privacy features. Determine if the free services provide enough ad-blocking to meet your needs or whether a paid app delivers more for your money. Many of the best ad blockers are available for free, either as extensions or as standalone apps, though a few, like AdLock, charge a fee. The usual caveats apply: Browsing through Tor will slow down the web experience, and some features, like video streams and video files won’t work in order to preserve anonymity.ĭownload Onion Browser: iOS How to choose the best ad blocker for you Previously a premium app, Onion Browser has since moved to a donation model, opening up access to everyone who wants to download the app, without compromising security or features. IMHO, all they will do is make a fork famous, probably Brave has the most momentum.IOS users aren’t left out when it comes to browsing the Tor anonymizer network, with the Onion Browser among the more popular options on Apple’s mobile OS. The demand is too great for this to carry any weight. So in order for me, Pale Moon, in combination with a portable, feature freeze Chrome/Edge. I will not, under any circumstances, watch Youtube with ads. If indeed this gutting happens and Chrome and Edge cut off updates, I will probably pihole my network and just stop updating. I personally moved to Pale Moon, it's safe, but not the best compatibility out there and has a bit of a learning curve (forked off Firefox 3.5 UI, so more customizable, but most addons are legacy). They made all other changes in lockstep with Chrome and I'm afraid that all you're getting is a bit of time at the cost of a long migration process. Mozilla is telemetrying my pants size, pinky primise not to sell it, while hobbling their browser by making old extensions not work, redoing the UI and generally aping Chrome to the point that they are indistinguishable. I moved off recently because they are really, really not that good at it. Specially when said feature could save your ass if you accidentally clicked something you didn't want to download. You tell me if a feature being changed permanently (it is not toggable unless you mess with the ever 'will-be-removed-by-next-version' about:config settings) can be justified by an argument that uses the word "usually" in two sentences back to back. Having to click a second time for a download to start is usually unnecessary. It is a potential security risk:įirefox no longer shows the dialog by default because downloads are usually intentional. It is not "just" a matter of "you will get used to it". A recent update (FF 98) changed dramatically how files downloaded are handled. Sadly firefox has its head up its own ass and listen to zero feedback when it comes to their "it isn't broken, but we fixed it regardless" updates. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |